Google VS. Journalism
Murdoch has been no turning back, "The Wall Street Journal" and the Associated Press they would join the chorus of condemnation of Google. The melody is going through, so the music industry is singing: blame you blame you blame you, you let me live, and I have my money back.
So at the end boil down to this question: Who will feed a changing colour industry? In other remarks, Henry Ford for the carriage development, the descent of responsible?
Journalism seems to be justified grievances. Google index our content, and you see, we are in the shrinking of the advertising revenue, Google's advertising revenue is still growing, Google took the money that belongs to us. Google said that if you do not want to let me index, it is easy, ah, in your robots.txt to add two lines of code can be. But Murdoch would certainly not do, he wants to Google the flow, but also want Google's revenue. In fact, he really would like to say that, as the largest Internet companies, Google has the responsibility to feed the press down extra aged.
Why? Journalism can not keep up the development of the times, how to become a Google error?
I have never heard of, TechCrunch or Read / Write Web asked Google to feed, so the news is, the difference sounds so greatly? Yes, the Internet has destroyed many of us who have a solid business model, at the same time, the Internet has spawned many new business models. Some people only know that staring at Google, but he did not know how to stare at hand mouse users. If the non-commercial Wikipedia can live well, I can only say that some things deserve to die already.
I do not accept as factual that the melodies commerce past away, we did not actually hearing to music; I do not accept as factual that the bulletin had to pass away, we actually do not read the news. If they actually can not endure in the digital age, so if they can only accuse on other ones, then let them pass away well. I would like to understand that the butcher is dead, we are not only consuming hog belt.
The death of conventional journalism, in item, not so appalling, where they plunge, we will set digression a large opportunity. Keep abreast of the times to sanction population to do it. - 18418
So at the end boil down to this question: Who will feed a changing colour industry? In other remarks, Henry Ford for the carriage development, the descent of responsible?
Journalism seems to be justified grievances. Google index our content, and you see, we are in the shrinking of the advertising revenue, Google's advertising revenue is still growing, Google took the money that belongs to us. Google said that if you do not want to let me index, it is easy, ah, in your robots.txt to add two lines of code can be. But Murdoch would certainly not do, he wants to Google the flow, but also want Google's revenue. In fact, he really would like to say that, as the largest Internet companies, Google has the responsibility to feed the press down extra aged.
Why? Journalism can not keep up the development of the times, how to become a Google error?
I have never heard of, TechCrunch or Read / Write Web asked Google to feed, so the news is, the difference sounds so greatly? Yes, the Internet has destroyed many of us who have a solid business model, at the same time, the Internet has spawned many new business models. Some people only know that staring at Google, but he did not know how to stare at hand mouse users. If the non-commercial Wikipedia can live well, I can only say that some things deserve to die already.
I do not accept as factual that the melodies commerce past away, we did not actually hearing to music; I do not accept as factual that the bulletin had to pass away, we actually do not read the news. If they actually can not endure in the digital age, so if they can only accuse on other ones, then let them pass away well. I would like to understand that the butcher is dead, we are not only consuming hog belt.
The death of conventional journalism, in item, not so appalling, where they plunge, we will set digression a large opportunity. Keep abreast of the times to sanction population to do it. - 18418


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home